In this performance assessment, students will draw from informational text read/listened to/viewed in class and independently. They will analyze information about the pros and cons of a decision regarding a community issue (e.g., increasing the development of oil refineries, access to clean drinking water, environmental issues, funding for schools or services, health disparities, and inequities for different groups) including the impact on economics, environment, and health. The students will demonstrate the expectations of comprehension of text, research, writing an argumentative speech, and the presentation of an argument in an oral manner.
Based on their analysis of sources, students will identify whether the decision about a community issue is acceptable, whether specific expectations should be mandated before the decision goes into effect, or if the decision is unacceptable in any form. The students will demonstrate expectations of comprehension of informational text and writing an argumentative speech to the city council. Students will create a presentation and present their argumentative speech.
This performance assessment would come at the end of a unit in which students have had opportunities to learn and practice argumentation and persuasive techniques, including those that constitute an effective argument (claim, evidence, reasoning), and persuasive rhetorical techniques grounded in ethos, pathos, and logos.
In this performance assessment, students will draw from informational text read/listened to/viewed in class and independently. They will analyze information about the pros and cons of a decision regarding a community issue (e.g., increasing the development of oil refineries, access to clean drinking water, environmental issues, funding for schools or services, health disparities, and inequities for different groups) including the impact on economics, environment, and health. The students will demonstrate the expectations of comprehension of text, research, writing an argumentative speech, and the presentation of an argument in an oral manner.
Based on their analysis of sources, students will identify whether the decision about a community issue is acceptable, whether specific expectations should be mandated before the decision goes into effect, or if the decision is unacceptable in any form. The students will demonstrate expectations of comprehension of informational text and writing an argumentative speech to the city council. Students will create a presentation and present their argumentative speech.
This performance assessment would come at the end of a unit in which students have had opportunities to learn and practice argumentation and persuasive techniques, including those that constitute an effective argument (claim, evidence, reasoning), and persuasive rhetorical techniques grounded in ethos, pathos, and logos.
Big Ideas | Competencies |
---|---|
B. Reading Informational TextStudents can read with purpose, understand and analyze information and evidence to construct meaning in increasingly complex texts. |
B1Students can use evidence to support an analysis of the development of a key idea in a nonfiction text with scaffolding. B3Students can trace an argument, evaluating whether specific claims are supported by evidence. |
C. WritingStudents can effectively communicate purpose to an intended audience through written language, using a variety of media. |
C1Students can write arguments to support a claim using clear reasoning and relevant evidence from credible sources. |
D. Speaking and ListeningStudents can listen effectively, present information appropriately to a variety of audiences, given the situation, and collaborate with peers. |
D1Students can present information in a logical order using speaking techniques like eye contact, adequate volume, clear pronunciation, and visuals to clarify information. D2Students can actively participate in collaborative discussions by coming prepared, following rules for discussion, asking, and responding to questions, paraphrasing, and reflection. |
F. Style and LanguageStudents can apply conventions of grammar and use academic and domain-specific vocabulary. |
F2Students will use visuals when appropriate. |
Below are analytic teacher rubrics. The column on the left shows the dimension that is being measured in the student’s performance. The levels across the top row indicate the performance level in the dimensions. Occasionally all dimensions and performance levels are exemplified by multiple students in a single recording.
Dimensions | Not Yet Meeting Expectations | Meeting Expectations | Exceeding Expectations |
---|---|---|---|
Focus/Organization |
No exemplars at this time.
|
No exemplars at this time.
|
No exemplars at this time.
|
Development/Comprehension |
No exemplars at this time.
|
No exemplars at this time.
|
No exemplars at this time.
|
Style/Conventions |
No exemplars at this time.
|
No exemplars at this time.
|
No exemplars at this time.
|
Speaking/Listening Presentation |
No exemplars at this time.
|
No exemplars at this time.
|
No exemplars at this time.
|
What did you like? Did you need to revise anything? How could we make this assessment better? Our Assessments are written by teachers for you, so your feedback is important to us!
Comments about items may be moderated and/or reposted to aid item improvement and teacher learning. By leaving a comment, you agree that we can use your comment without attributing it to you.