Overview

In this performance assessment, students will draw from texts read in class and informational text read independently, as well as from research about how a specific group gained and lost power throughout history. Specifically, students will be asked to create a text mirroring a mentor text that emphasizes various argumentative techniques to illustrate how a specific group/community experienced an imbalance of power throughout history. 

Students will synthesize the information to be included in their text to indicate various parts of the group’s identity, how privilege played out in society, and how we got to this moment in time, helping to answer the larger question: How has a historical imbalance of power impacted modern society? The students will demonstrate the expectations of comprehension of text and writing an argumentative essay. 

This performance assessment might come at the end of an instructional unit focusing on reading a variety of texts that focused on answering the larger question (How has a historical imbalance of power impacted modern society?) Students should engage in reading texts such as Stamped: Racism, Antiracism, and You by Jason Reynolds and Ibram X. Kendi, among other teacher- and student-selected texts. 

Additionally, students should explore this theme, develop close reading skills using nonfiction text, understand how to critically examine texts and not take them at face value, and work on cultivating research skills.

Details

Big Ideas & Competencies

Big Ideas Competencies

B. Reading Informational Text

Students can read with purpose, understand and analyze information and evidence to construct meaning in increasingly complex texts.

B3

Students can precisely describe the argument and evaluate the relevance of evidence in the text.

B4

Students can analyze how an author responds to conflicting viewpoints.

C. Writing

Students can effectively communicate purpose to an intended audience through written language, using a variety of media.

C2

Students can write informational texts using facts, definitions, details, quotations, and examples to examine a topic.

C6

Students can write conclusions that follows from and supports the argument, information, explanation, or narrative presented, and reflect on the topic.

E. Research and Inquiry

Students can engage in research and inquiry to investigate topics, evaluate and analyze the validity of sources, and synthesize information to communicate findings.

E2

Students can gather relevant research from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively, and assessing the credibility and accuracy of sources, to answer a self-generated question and generate new questions that allow multiple avenues of exploration.

F. Style and Language

Students can apply conventions of grammar and use academic and domain-specific vocabulary.

F1

Students will maintain a consistent style and tone of writing that fits purpose.

NOTE ABOUT ASSESSMENT RUBRICS

Below are analytic teacher rubrics. The column on the left shows the dimension that is being measured in the student’s performance. The levels across the top row indicate the performance level in the dimensions. Occasionally all dimensions and performance levels are exemplified by multiple students in a single recording.

Teacher Rubric

Dimensions Not Yet Meeting Expectations Meeting Expectations Exceeding Expectations

Focus/Organization

  • Partially addresses the expectations of the prompt.
  • Introduces a claim but parts of the essay shift and do not connect to the claim, or a claim and/or opposing claims are not established.
  • Uses a basic or ineffective body structure to organize or group the reasons, and/or evidence.
  • A basic conclusion which restates the claim or is a general summary of the information is used or the conclusion does not support the claim and/or reasons. 
No exemplars at this time.
  • Addresses the expectations of the prompt.
  • Introduces a claim, distinguishing it from alternate or opposing claims, and coherently maintains the claim throughout the essay.
  • Uses a logical body structure to organize and group related reasons and evidence that support the claim.
  • Provides a concluding statement or section that follows from the claim and reasons and supports the argument presented. 
No exemplars at this time.
  • Fully and thoroughly addresses the expectations of the prompt.
  • Clearly establishes a credible claim and explains alternate or opposing claims, and coherently maintains the claim in an insightful manner throughout the essay.
  • Uses a coherent and sophisticated body structure to organize and group related reasons and evidence that support the claim.
  • Provides a concluding statement or section that follows from and clearly supports the claim, reasons and key points in a fresh way.
No exemplars at this time.

Development/Comprehension

  • Supports a claim with unfounded reasons and/or evidence is from questionable sources.
  • Provides a weak explanation of the evidence demonstrating minimal understanding of the topic or text(s). 
No exemplars at this time.
  • Supports a claim with logical reasons and relevant evidence from credible and accurate sources.
  • Provides an explanation of the evidence to demonstrate an understanding of the topic or texts. 
No exemplars at this time.
  • Supports a claim with logical and insightful reasoning and relevant and precise evidence from credible and accurate sources.
  • Provides a clear and insightful explanation of the evidence demonstrating a thorough understanding of the topic or texts. 
No exemplars at this time.

Style/Conventions

  • Uses generic vocabulary to identify and explain the topic and/or supporting information.
  • Uses basic or ineffective transitions to clarify the relationship between the claim, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.
  • Uses inconsistent grammar and conventions which detract from the quality of the essay.
  • Uses ineffective sentence structures creating an informal style and tone. 
No exemplars at this time.
  • Uses precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to identify and explain the topic and supporting information.
  • Uses transitional words, phrases, and clauses to create cohesion and clarify the relationship among the claim, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.
  • Uses grade-appropriate grammar and conventions; errors are minor and do not interfere with meaning and readability.
  • Uses correct and varied sentence structures and precise vocabulary to establish a formal style and tone. 
No exemplars at this time.
  • Uses precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to identify and explain the topic, ideas, and concepts, and supporting information.
  • Uses sophisticated and varied transitional words, phrases, and clauses to create cohesion and clarify the relationship among the claim, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.
  • Uses advanced grammar and convention; errors are minor and do not impact the clarity and quality of the essay.
  • Uses advanced and varied sentence structures to establish a formal style and tone. 
No exemplars at this time.

Leave Feedback for this Assessment

What did you like? Did you need to revise anything? How could we make this assessment better? Our Assessments are written by teachers for you, so your feedback is important to us!

Comments about items may be moderated and/or reposted to aid item improvement and teacher learning. By leaving a comment, you agree that we can use your comment without attributing it to you.

You must be logged in to leave feedback.

Don't have an account? Register Here

Log in